« IONA's Artix is an extensible ESB, but is this a good or bad thing? | Main | Are integration specialists an endangered species? »

October 16, 2006

Legacy transformation - is this the old IBM creeping back?

As part of its latest SOA swathe of announcements, I was struck by the details on the IBM Legacy Transformation Services, targeted at addressing legacy transformation and integration challenges, particularly within an overall SOA strategy. This has led me to wonder about the extent to which 'old IBM' is coming back.

This service makes a big feature out of providing a single-vendor solution. This is despite the fact that legacy integration is an area where IBM partners tend to offer far superior products, at least for older levels of mainframe software like CICS and IMS. There was a time when IBM Global Services used to concentrate on doing the best job for the customer, regardless of the supplier. IBM technologies for legacy integration tend to be generalized, and rather messy and complex compared to the smooth, intuitive and specialized  solutions from others such as NEON Software (now part of Sonic), Seagull and GT Software. I have seen GT Software's Ivory in action, for example, and it is remarkably intuitive and streets ahead of the IBM offerings.

I hope this is just a blip. IBM has vast experience, particularly in SOA where it has dealt with many engagements, and it therefore has a tremendous amount to offer in planning, guidance, management and governance services.  It would be a real shame if this was compromised by a limitation to only using IBM's own tools.

Steve

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834539c9269e200d83535e49f53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Legacy transformation - is this the old IBM creeping back?:

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Statcounter